Legal Opinion
In re: Dequintan Arnick
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 17, 2016No. 16-10328PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*788PER CURIAM: *
Dequintan Arnick, federal prisoner # 39501-177, moves for authorization to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He may file a successive motion if he makes a prima facie showing that his motion “contain[s]” either “newly discovered evidence that ... would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty,” or “a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” § 2255(h); Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Calvin MatchettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Israel Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Roy GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Thomas Hoffner, Jr. v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In Re: Eric CatheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Shedrick Henry v. M. SpearmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.