Legal Opinion

Snell v. Wyman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 13, 1969No. 191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Welfare Rights Organization v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Charleston v. WohlgemuthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Snell v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Sturgell v. CreasyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Rite Aid Corp. v. Bd. of Pharmacy of State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API