Legal Opinion

State v. Recuenco

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2005No. 74964-7PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Arturo Recuenco was charged with second degree assault with a deadly weapon enhancement because he assaulted his wife while holding a gun. At trial, the jury returned a guilty verdict on the assault charge and a special verdict that Recuenco was armed with a deadly weapon. But the trial court imposed a sentence enhancement based on Recuenco’s being armed with a firearm, *159which was greater than that for a deadly weapon. This court granted review to consider whether imposition of a firearm enhancement without a jury finding that Recuenco was armed with a firearm beyond a reasonable doubt…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. RecuencoWashington Supreme Court · 2008

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API