State v. Recuenco
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Arturo Recuenco was charged with second degree assault with a deadly weapon enhancement because he assaulted his wife while holding a gun. At trial, the jury returned a guilty verdict on the assault charge and a special verdict that Recuenco was armed with a deadly weapon. But the trial court imposed a sentence enhancement based on Recuenco’s being armed with a firearm, *159which was greater than that for a deadly weapon. This court granted review to consider whether imposition of a firearm enhancement without a jury finding that Recuenco was armed with a firearm beyond a reasonable doubt…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RecuencoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.