Legal Opinion

Glaser v. Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1961No. 38799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This is an appeal by Mr. and Mrs. Harold E. Glaser from a judgment of the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, sustaining the action of the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission in approving a subdivision plat of the Rondo Valley Addition.

Plaintiffs are the owners of a five-acre tract of land north of and contiguous to the twenty-acre Rondo Valley Addition, which is owned by Chandler-Frates Company. Both tracts face east on Lewis Avenue, a main thoroughfare running north and south. The south line of the Glaser tract, which is the north line of the Rondo Valley…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. City of Healdton v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tinker Investment & Mortgage Corp. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Utility Supply Co., Inc. v. City of Broken ArrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Holtzen v. Tulsa County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Opinion No. 73-311 (1974) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API