Legal Opinion

Eller Bros. v. Perkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burnett

This is what might be termed the backfire of a Workmen’s Compensation case. By agreement of counsel *154nothing is involved herein that isn’t disclosed by the technical record. After an appeal had been perfected counsel withdrew the bill of exceptions and frankly state that they bottom their case only on what is shown by the technical record.

On October 31,1967, a consent order was entered into by the employee, employer and its insurance carrier fixing a certain percentage of disability to the employee which grew out of and in the course of his employment. Sometime later, on or about March 1,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartwell Motor Co., Inc. v. HickersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pratt v. GillespieTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Lindsey v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Scruggs v. HeiskellTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Daniel v. Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. OnohCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  2. Corby v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Wooley v. Gould, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wooley v. Gould, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API