Legal Opinion
Dancy v. Fina Oil & Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided December 16, 1997No. 1:96-cv-00196PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Fina Oil & Chemical Company. Plaintiffs, including Herman Dancy, filed suit claiming that they were exposed to intentional infliction of emotional distress and an invasion of their privacy by the management of Fina, who allegedly published a list of employees with excessive absences. Because plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden of setting forth specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial and because the alleged conduct does not give rise to actionable claims of intentional…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Gonnering v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
- Leach v. District Board of Trustees of Palm BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017