Legal Opinion
Garrity v. Klimisch
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 2, 2020No. 4:20-cv-04027Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION PATRICK GARRITY, 20-CV-4027-LLP Plaintiff, vs. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND DANIEL KLIMISCH, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH HEALY, individually and in his official capacity, and YANKTON COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA, Defendants. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff, Patrick Garrity’s (“Garrity”) Motion to Amend Complaint, Doc. 11. For the following reasons, Garrity’s Motion to Amend is granted. BACKGROUND On February 11, 2020, Plaintiff, Patrick Garrity (“Garrity”) filed a complaint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.