Legal Opinion

Russell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, C. J.

In addition to the matters before referred to, it was alleged in general terms that, through negligence on the part of defendant in the operation of a locomotive through the city of Anamosa, sparks and live coals were permitted to escape, which set fire to the property and destroyed it; that the insurance companies are subrogated to Russell’s rights against defendant to the extent of the settlements; that Russell’s loss above the amounts received from the insurance companies was more than $4,000.

Answering, defendant denied generally, and alleged that the engine operated by defendant was.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Matthews v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Dunning v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
  4. Hagan v. Merchants & Bankers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Board of Park Commissioners v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark v. BremnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. Jensvold v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Connor v. Thompson Construction & Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. United Security Insurance Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Rauch v. Des Moines Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API