Legal Opinion
Mann v. Hanil Bank
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 31, 1995No. 94-C-1165PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court are (1) defendants Korea Exchange Bank (“KEB”) and Industrial Bank of Korea’s (“Industrial Bank”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), and (2) defendants Hanil Bank, KEB, Cho Hung Bank, Commercial Bank of Korea, Ltd., and Industrial Bank’s (collectively referred to hereinafter as “the Korean banks”) Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (3), and (6) in the above-captioned matter. For the following reasons, the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raccoon Recovery, LLC v. Navoi Mining and Metallurgical KombinatDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. National Catholic Reporter Publishing Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997