Legal Opinion

Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1949PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This suit was brought by W. J. Cottrell and Hazel F. Cottrell, his wife, against Arthur R. Prier and Violet I. Prier, his wife, for specific performance of a written contract wherein plaintiffs agreed to purchase from defendants, and defendants agreed to sell to plaintiffs, certain described real property in Washington County, Oregon.

The complaint alleges the execution of the contract, its performance in accordance with the provisions thereof by the plaintiffs, and the failure and refusal of defendants to carry out their part of the contract. The answer admits that defendants signed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaver v. BrainardNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Wheeler v. LackOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Tobin v. Portland Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hawkenson v. RostadOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Heinzel v. BackstromOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pike v. Allen International Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Vandeventer v. Dale Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Beers v. Beers, AdministratrixOregon Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API