Wilkerson v. Mitchell

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Wilkerson’s claims challenge the validity and sufficiency of his indictment and are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Shie v. Leonard (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 160, 161, 702 N.E.2d 419, 420. Moreover, Wilkerson’s robbery convictions were based on an indictment expressly charging him with those offenses.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.