Legal Opinion

Shie v. Leonard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1998No. 98-1673PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

In his propositions of law, Shie asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. In order to withstand dismissal, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus must conform to R.C. 2725.04 and state with particularity the extraordinary circumstances entitling the petitioner to the writ. *161McBroom v. Russell (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 47, 48, 671 N.E.2d 10, 11. For the following reasons, Shie’s claims were insufficient to withstand dismissal.

First, as the court of appeals correctly held, the trial court had jurisdiction over Shie because he was charged, convicted, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tran v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. McBroom v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Thornton v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Orr v. Schweitzer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Davic v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. CobbOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API