Constance Garcia and Frank Garcia v. Helen F. Von Micsky, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lajos Von Micsky, Deceased
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentOakes, Circuit Judge
There was no negligence. The jury found there was no uninformed consent. There was no warranty prior to the performance of the surgery.
However, appellants pleaded and there was evidence — evidently admissible under the New York dead man’s statute 1 — to the effect that five months after the operation the surgeon guaranteed its success without making the tests that he could have made to verify whether the tubal ligation had been successful. There was also evidence that Mrs. Garcia relied on the guarantee and did so to her detriment, having an unwanted pregnancy necessitating, in view of her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Goodman v. DickerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Matter of Estate of StrautNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Spiegel v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.