Legal Opinion

Roe v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 1990No. 8707-91551; CA A51010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Appellants, decedent’s children, appeal from a probate judgment distributing proceeds of a settlement to decedent’s wife. We review de novo, Williams v. Cover, 74 Or App 711, 713 n 2, 704 P2d 548 (1985), and affirm.

In February, 1986, decedent filed a medical malprac-* tice action, which was amended in December to include a claim by wife for loss of consortium. In June, 1987, decedent died as a result of the alleged malpractice. Wife was appointed personal representative of decedent’s estate in July and, in that capacity, filed a separate wrongful death action in October against the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Satterfield v. SatterfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Portland Adventist Medical Center v. SheffieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Williams v. CoverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roe v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Doe v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API