Roe v. Pierce
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Appellants, decedent’s children, appeal from a probate judgment distributing proceeds of a settlement to decedent’s wife. We review de novo, Williams v. Cover, 74 Or App 711, 713 n 2, 704 P2d 548 (1985), and affirm.
In February, 1986, decedent filed a medical malprac-* tice action, which was amended in December to include a claim by wife for loss of consortium. In June, 1987, decedent died as a result of the alleged malpractice. Wife was appointed personal representative of decedent’s estate in July and, in that capacity, filed a separate wrongful death action in October against the same…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Satterfield v. SatterfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Portland Adventist Medical Center v. SheffieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Williams v. CoverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roe v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Doe v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994