Legal Opinion

Berwick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1930No. 13465PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

On the question of the admissibility of evidence given by witness as to a conversation with and a statement by one of the parties killed occurring before the killing and which was never communicated to appellant, the attorneys for appellant cite Branch’s Ann. Penal Code, Section 1930; Bromley v. State, 17 S. W. 140; Johnson v. State, 2 S. W. 609. Reporter.

MARTIN, Judge.

Offense, murder; penalty, death.

Appellant shot and killed Miss Bell Crow and William A. Byrd about eleven o’clock at night in the edge of a street in the City of Port Arthur.

It was the State’s theory and its evidence tended to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886
  2. Brumley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jamar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Winn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  3. Berwick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API