Berwick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
On the question of the admissibility of evidence given by witness as to a conversation with and a statement by one of the parties killed occurring before the killing and which was never communicated to appellant, the attorneys for appellant cite Branch’s Ann. Penal Code, Section 1930; Bromley v. State, 17 S. W. 140; Johnson v. State, 2 S. W. 609. Reporter.
MARTIN, Judge.
Offense, murder; penalty, death.
Appellant shot and killed Miss Bell Crow and William A. Byrd about eleven o’clock at night in the edge of a street in the City of Port Arthur.
It was the State’s theory and its evidence tended to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886
- Brumley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jamar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Winn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
- Berwick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.