Legal Opinion
Alvarez v. Schwarz
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
The principal issue that I must resolve in connection with this extraordinary application is whether the New York City Commission On Human Rights (NYCCHR) may vacate or *693modify its prior order (even after it has beeil judicially affirmed) when it is learned that the complaining witness lied at the hearing before the Commission and submitted into evidence a forged document.
A subsidiary issue involves what is, in essence, a motion to disqualify the Corporation Counsel from advising the NYCCHR on the means to rectify the results of the proceeding previously…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People Ex Rel. Finnegan v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People Ex Rel. Childs v. Extraordinary Trial Term of the Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Rudow v. New York City Commission on Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989