Legal Opinion
Rudow v. New York City Commission on Human Rights
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kristin Booth Glen, J.
This case raises a question of first impression in New York: whether sexual harassment not tied to threat of job reprisals violates the City of New York’s Law on Human Rights.1
Petitioner Norman Rudow (Rudow) seeks judicial review2 of a December 31,1982 decision and order of the New *710York City Commission on Human Rights (Commission) which assessed damages against him and his corporate employer upon finding that they had engaged in sexual harassment3 of Ms. Brenda Alvarez (Alvarez). He requests an order vacating and setting aside the Commission’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- James G. CARIDDI, Appellant, v. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC., and Robert M. Wachter, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Norman Rudow v. The City of New York, the City of New York Commission on Human Rights, and Lois WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Walsh v. National Westminster Bancorp., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- PEOPLE OF STATE OF NY, BY ABRAMS v. MerlinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Maffei v. Kolaeton Industry, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.