Legal Opinion

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, reversal is not required based on County Court’s refusal to admit in evidence a written prior inconsistent statement by a prosecution witness. The substance of that prior statement was admitted in evidence through defense counsel’s cross-examination of that witness (see, People v Piazza, 48 *1023NY2d 151, 164-165; People v Moore, 267 AD2d 969, 969-970). There is no merit to the contention that defendant was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct on summation. Several of the allegedly improper statements…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. PiazzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. RootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Peppard v. FischerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
  5. MAY, JONATHAN N., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API