Legal Opinion

United States v. Pinkerton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 31, 2017No. 17-8038UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

John Scott Pinkerton pled guilty to attempted online enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), and, consistent with a plea agreement executed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), received the statutory minimum sentence of ten years’ imprisonment. After a prior motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was dismissed as untimely, he filed a pleading entitled “Constitutional Challenge to Statute of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b),” claiming that the statute underlying his conviction is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to him. R.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re ClineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Clark v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. In Re RainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Stanko v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Darnell Jerome-Murphy Bey v. Gentner Drummond; Pam Bondi; Heidi D. Campbell; Kevin Stitt; Sarah Wallace; Matthew Ballard; Jacqueline Stout; Pat Mays; Samuel WalkerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026
  2. Santora v. Copyright Claims BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API