Legal Opinion
LaPort v. Bojedla
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and new trial granted on damages for past pain and suffering only unless defendant, within 20 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, stipulates to increase the verdict to *1026$85,000 for past pain and suffering, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as modified affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The contention of plaintiff that he was denied a fair trial by prejudicial comments by defendant’s attorney during summation is unpreserved for our review (see, Hitchcock v Best, 247 AD2d 769).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Crawford v. MarcelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hitchcock v. BestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Faulise v. TroutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Murray v. MakeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conley v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Aman v. Federal Express Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- RYE, GAIL E. v. LIFT LINE, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rye v. Lift Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012