Legal Opinion

Rydberg v. Mitchel

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided December 7, 1949No. A-5800Published

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, District Judge.

Motion of defendant, Wilburn Baker, to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint for the reason that the complaint does not state any claim upon which relief can be granted as against defendant, Wilburn Baker-Denied.

The plaintiff in her complaint alleges that on October 2, 1949, the plaintiff engaged defendant’s servant, Thomas Mitchel, who was then and there on duty as a taxi-cab operator in the employ of defendants, to bring plaintiff to a certain address in the vicinity of Anchorage, Alaska; that while in the taxi-cab as a fare-paying passenger, defendant, Thomas Mitchel,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hairston v. . Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Hairston v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Swift v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Cunningham v. Seattle Electric Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API