Jackson v. Petit Jean Electric Co-Op
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn I. Purtie, Justice
In my opinion, the facts of this case are adequately stated in the majority opinion. This dissent is based upon the contract between respondent and the independent contractor, Johnson Construction Company. The owner-respondent specifically reserved the right to control the number of employees doing the work for Johnson. It also retained control over the quality and type of equipment to be used on the job. Additionally, it reserved the right to inspect and approve, as well as to effectually supervise, the working conditions of Johnson’s employees.
The complaint alleged respondent was negligent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Aluminum Ore Company v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- New Hampshire Insurance v. QuilantanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978