City of Ithaca v. Ithaca Street Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Kellogg, J.:
Prior to April 15, 1908, the defendant, under a franchise from the plaintiff, maintained and operated a single-track surface railway on State, Eddy and Tioga streets in the city of Ithaca. Upon that day it applied to' the plaintiff for permission to construct and maintain a double-track railway upon some of said streets, and a franchise was granted it by the plaintiff on or about May 13, 1908, and formally accepted by the defendant June 3, 1908. The 18th section of said agreement or franchise provided in substance that the' railway company should pay to the city on or before…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Heerwagen v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lang v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
- Teleprompter Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Alexandre v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc.Mount Vernon City Court · 1938
- National Surety Corp. v. Federal Reserve BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.