Legal Opinion

Teleprompter Corp. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sandler, J.

On July 28, 1970, the Board of Estimate granted Teleprompter Corporation and its subsidiary Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. (hereinafter Teleprompter) a 20-year “franchise and right to install, operate and maintain” a community antenna television system (CATV) in two districts in upper Manhattan subject to the terms and conditions in an accompanying franchise contract. The contract provided, inter alia, for compensation to the City of New York at 5% “of its [Teleprompter’s] Gross Receipts from provision of Basic Service to Residential Subscribers,” 10% of all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Heerwagen v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. City of Ithaca v. Ithaca Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co. v. DelaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. New York Railways Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Fisk Building Associates LLC v. Shimazaki II, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Consolidated Edison Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API