Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Robbins

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 21, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bubenstein, S.

The proponents in a contested probate proceeding served upon contestants a notice in pursuance of section 322 of the Civil Practice Act to admit certain facts set out therein. The latter now seek, through notice of motion, an order declaring that specified items in the notice are irrelevant and that they be relieved from the necessity of answering said items. The motion is opposed upon the ground that all questions as to the reasonableness of the demand or of the sufficiency or effect of an answer thereto must be determined at the trial and cannot be determined in advance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langan v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. Rusnak v. DobyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. Banca Nazionale Di Credito v. Equitable Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Meyers v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  2. Redman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API