Legal Opinion

Diane S. P. v. Berryhill

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 21, 2019No. Action No. 4:17cv143PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark S. Davis, Chief United States District Judge

Plaintiff, Diane S. P. ("Plaintiff"), with the assistance of counsel, brought this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying her claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as Rule 72 of the Local Rules of this Court, for a Report and…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Hinds v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020
  3. Hofler v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020
  4. Hofler v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
  5. Kersh v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API