Legal Opinion
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Hurm
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 1981No. 1-880A202PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff-appellant Indiana & Michigan Electric Company appeals the judgment of the Dubois Circuit Court on a jury verdict awarding damages to the defendants-appel-lees Bernard E. Hurm and Cecelia J. Hurm in an action in eminent domain.
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Bernard E. Hurm and Cecelia J. Hurm, husband and wife (hereinafter called “the Hurms”), owned ten acres of land in Spencer County near Rockport, adjacent to U.S. Highway 231 (also State Road 45) and approximately one mile from the Ohio River. Mr. Hurm was born on the property, and in recent…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- McGovern v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Guardiola v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clouse v. FielderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nahmias Realty, Inc. v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- J.J. Newberry Co. v. City of East Chicago Ex Rel. Department of RedevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- City of Valdez v. 18.99 Acres, More or Less, of Land Situated in the City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Raymond E. Heinold Family TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.