Guardiola v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPivarnik, J.
Appellant Guardiola was convicted of two violations of the Indiana Controlled Substances Act at the conclusion of a bench trial in the DeKalb Circuit Court on September 8, 1976. He alleges six errors in this appeal which we deal with as follows: (1) five alleged errors, all of which are waived and which we thus treat together; (2) an alleged error in the admission of evidence from an allegedly unreasonable search and seizure of appellant’s automobile.
I
The proper procedures for presenting an issue for appellate review in Indiana are established in well-known Trial and Appellate Rules. They…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jesse Coy Kimbrough v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. MurrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Daniel Lee Pierce v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Gariup Const. Co., Inc. v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LoewenWashington Supreme Court · 1982
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.