Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank in Sioux City v. Curran

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 28, 1973No. 55373Published

1DissentRees, Justice

I must respectfully dissent.

The action of plaintiff-bank against Mrs. Curran to recover the deposits in joint tenancy at the time of Miss Crosby’s death was in several divisions, but on trial the case turned upon the sole question as to whether the transfers of the deposits into joint tenancy were invalid because of a confidential relationship between the two women. When trial court held for the bank on that basis, Mrs. Curran appealed.

While Mrs.. Curran asserts several propositions here, I find it necessary to consider the issue of confidential relationship only.

The evidence does not support…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Lundvall's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Groves v. GrovesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Oehler v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Utterback v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Albaugh v. ShropeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API