Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. McManigal

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtDunlap, J.

Hugh McManigal, the plaintiff’s decedent, was an electrical worker in the employ *385of The F. M. Grant Company, of Cleveland, and in February, 1917, with other workmen, was engaged in installing electric wires and conduits in a new factory building, partly completed, and owned by The Peerless Automobile Company of Cleveland.

The building had a gabled roof and ceiling and was heated by open stoves or salamanders, between thirty and fifty in all, burning coke, and throwing off carbon-monoxide and carbon-dioxide gases.

The electrical conduits were being attached to and along certain iron beams in the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krull v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. United States v. Jerome M. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API