Legal Opinion

Krull v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1940No. 2706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, J.

Deference will be made to the parties as they appeared in the court below.

Defendant, the Industrial Commission of Ohio, appeals to this court on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning county entered upon a jury verdict for the plaintiffs in their action on appeal to determine their rights to participate in the workmen’s compensation fund of Ohio, as a result of the death of their decedent, William J. Krull.

The evidence discloses that decedent, William J. Krull, a welder by trade, operating in the city of Youngstown, Ohio, under the trade name and style of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ervin v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Industrial Commission v. FrankenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Goodman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Industrial Commission v. GardinioOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Industrial Commission v. LambertOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  2. Green v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API