Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Cabell

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1931No. 6946Published

1DissentHatoher, Judge

In tbe plaintiff’s amended bill be states specifically tbat tbe agreement witb Cabell in case plaintiff conld not secure tbe loan referred to in tbe majority opinion was, that Cabell “would return to tbe said plaintiff all of tbe consideration paid by the said plaintiff upon tbe said purchase and tbe said plaintiff would return to tbe said H. L. Cabell tbe said Shrews-bury Street property. ’ ’ If tbe Cabell deed was not to become effective before the loan was consummated, there would have been no need of an agreement for Brown “to return to tbe said H. L. Cabell” tbe lot. Brown would not have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Trust Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Bradshaw v. FarnsworthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. J. C. Orrick & Son Co. v. DawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Rouss v. RoussWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hensley v. SwannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API