Legal Opinion

State v. Economic Freedom Fund

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2011No. 07S00-1008-MI-411PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

In this case, the State seeks to enforce a particular provision of the Indiana Auto-dialer Law against an entity that uses an automated dialing device to deliver prerecorded political messages. The trial court, on cross-motions for preliminary injunction, decided that the entity had a reason*798able likelihood of success on the merits of its claim that the live-operator requirement of the Autodialer Law violates the free speech clause of the Indiana Constitution.

We hold that the entity’s First Amendment claim would likely fail. We also hold there is no reasonable likelihood of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. An-Hung Yao and Yu-Ting Lin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. James T. Mitchell v. 10th and The Bypass, LLC and Elway, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Mitchell v. 10th & The Bypass, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Akeem Daniels, Cameron Stingily, and Nicholas Stoner v. FanDuel, Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Robert E. Redington v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API