Legal Opinion

Paul v. City of Woonsocket

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 11, 2000No. 97-630-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOURCIER, Justice.

In this appeal we review a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, the City of Woonsocket, the city treasurer and the city council (collectively, the city) and against the plaintiffs, a conditionally certified class, consisting of Michael M. Paul, M. Paul and Son, Denis Mendoza and Roland L. Bois and all record title holders (plaintiffs), who had all been required by the enactment of a Woonsocket City Council ordinance to pay a water connection impact fee (tapping fee) to the city. They sought recovery of those fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Charles A. L. Almond v. John E. Kent, Sheriff of Augusta County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Splendorio v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Kelly v. MarcantonioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Lowenberg v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Melissa E. Goddard v. APG Security-RI, LLC, alias John Doe CorporationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. Riggs v. CurranDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016
  5. Horn v. Southern Union Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API