Legal Opinion

Bleak

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 8, 1977No. 115-76PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Defendant alone moves for summary judgment, asserting its panoply of pretrial defenses: the statute of limitations, laches, our lack of jurisdiction under the Testan rule, and finally a judgment on the merits of the issues presented. None of these grounds persuades us, though, so we deny defendant’s motion and remand for the trial that is needed in order to develop the material facts that will enable us to resolve this case.
"Plaintiff enlisted in the United States Army for three years beginning March 30, 1966, and served one of those years in combat in Vietnam. Soon after his return from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Fannie Mae Clackum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Werner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API