Legal Opinion
State v. Schmitt
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 2009No. 87A04-0903-CR-151PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
The Warrick Superior Court dismissed eriminal misdemeanor charges against Lindsey Schmitt ("Schmitt") due to the State's failure to comply with court-ordered discovery. The State appeals and argues that the trial court erred when it dismissed the charges as a sanction for a discovery violation absent a showing of deliberate misconduct or bad faith,. Concluding that the trial court did not clearly err when it dismissed the charges as a sanction for the discovery violation, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
On March 18, 2008, Schmitt was charged with Class A…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Fosha v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Gifford v. Westwood Lodge Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Indiana v. John B. LarkinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hozyfa H. Sultan v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Michael York v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- State of Indiana v. John B. LarkinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017