Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Slaton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1989No. 162 and 229Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKelly, Judge

I join in that part of the majority opinion which quashes Louis Slaton’s cross-appeal from the trial court’s disposition of Slaton’s suppression motion. I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which denies the Commonwealth’s appeal from the portion of the trial court’s order which directed the suppression of fraudulent prescriptions seized from Slaton’s Pharmacy on December 6, 1983 and Decern*322ber 7,1983. Because of the potential impact of this case on future narcotics law enforcement efforts in this Commonwealth, I set forth the reasons for my dissent at length.

The principle issue…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API