Legal Opinion

Scherz v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1949No. 32532PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages to their lands and crops caused by seepage waters which were alleged to have escaped from the reservoir and canal of the Platte Valley Public Power and Irrigation District. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiffs filed a motion for a new trial which was sustained by the trial court. The defendant appeals from the order granting a new trial.

The district contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a judgment for plaintiffs and that its motion for a directed verdict should have been sustained. It urges that this being…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Smith v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Carpenter v. Sun Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Glick v. PoskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ripley v. GoddenNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Holmes v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Kremlacek v. SedlacekNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. TrailNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Latham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API