Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Sto Corp.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided October 2, 1996No. Civil Action 95-D-636-NPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
This matter is now before the court on Defendant Sto Corporation’s (“Sto”) motion for summary judgment filed on July 15,1996. Plaintiffs, John Huggins and Floyd Simpson (“Plaintiffs”), responded in opposition to Defendant’s motion on August 7,1996.
After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant ease law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is due to be denied.
JURISDICTION
The court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Michael A. Barfield v. David Brierton, Louis Carmichael, Richard Dugger, Thomas Barton, David E. Watson, Jerry C. Wade, Randall R. Music, John ShawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peters v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
- Shutter Shop, Inc. v. Amersham Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
- Gary Edwin Bennett v. Trevecca Nazarene UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Simpson v. Sto CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998