Legal Opinion

Staley v. Espenlaub

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1930No. 268PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by appellants to establish their title to and for possession of described real estate in Wyandotte county, Kansas. Prior thereto the same plaintiffs had sued the same defendants on the same cause of action in the state court, and the court below sustained a plea of res adjudieata based on the judgment of the state court in the prior suit, which had been affirmed. Staley et al. v. Espenlaub et al. (Board of County Commissioners), 127 Kan. 627, 274 P. 261.

The history of the ease in the state court is this: It was instituted in January, 1928. The answer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Bryan v. KennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Central Trust Co. v. SeasongoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Staley v. EspenlaubSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. White v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  4. United States ex rel. Larkin v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API