Legal Opinion

Malaguit v. Ski Sundown, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 26, 2012No. AC 33180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ESPINOSA, J.

The substitute plaintiff James Malaguit 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to set aside the verdict, following a jury trial, in favor of the defendant, Ski Sundown, Inc. The plaintiff alleges that the court improperly (1) charged the jury on General Statutes § 29-212, (2) refused to provide the jury with the legislative history of § 29-212 to aid in its application of the statute, (3) failed to deliver an instruction concerning spoliation of evidence and (4) refused to instruct the jury that exculpatory language contained in documents that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Tetreault v. EslickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Gajewski v. PaveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Monterose v. CrossConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perez v. CumbaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Garcia v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. Cima v. SciarettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Garcia v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  5. Lukas v. McCoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API