Charles v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
After the granting of certification to appeal, the petitioner, Leo Felix Charles, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he was not denied the effective assistance of trial counsel and appellate counsel when both attorneys failed to raise an important jurisdictional issue. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
In State v. Charles, 56 Conn. App. 722, 745 A.2d 842, cert. denied, 252 Conn. 954, 749 A.2d 1203 (2000), we affirmed the…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. DashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HollowayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Young v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Charles v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Charles v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.