Legal Opinion
Contico Intern. v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 2, 1981No. 79-702C(A)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
506 F.Supp. 1072 (1981)
CONTICO INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
RUBBERMAID COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant.
No. 79-702C(A).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
January 2, 1981.
Ralph W. Kalish, Kalish & Gilster, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
John K. Roedel, Jr., Senninger, Powers, Leavitt & Roedel, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant in a single count, seeking a declaratory judgment that United States Design Letters Patent Number 251,833 (hereinafter referred to as 833) is unenforceable or that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- John K. Rains v. Cascade Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Contico International, Inc. v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- A & H Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Contempo Card Co., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
- Norco Products, Inc. v. Mecca Development, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
- Electronic Molding Corp. v. Mupac Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
- Moore v. StewartDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1985