Legal Opinion

City of Huntington v. Mendenhall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7617PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C.

— This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages for an injury sustained by-failure to keep in repair the Fort Recovery road within the limits of the city of Huntington.

*461There was an answer in denial of the amended complaint,. a trial by jury and a verdict against the appellant; a motion, for a new trial was overruled; judgment was rendered on the verdict for thirty dollars and costs ; and this appeal was taken.

Errors were assigned by the appellant as follows:

1. The court erred in oveiTuling the demurrer to the complaint;

2. The court erred in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. McAroy v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Fultz v. WycoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Fillson v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Douglass v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hopkins v. BoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. West v. EleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. LottichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API