City of Huntington v. Mendenhall
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C.
— This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages for an injury sustained by-failure to keep in repair the Fort Recovery road within the limits of the city of Huntington.
*461There was an answer in denial of the amended complaint,. a trial by jury and a verdict against the appellant; a motion, for a new trial was overruled; judgment was rendered on the verdict for thirty dollars and costs ; and this appeal was taken.
Errors were assigned by the appellant as follows:
1. The court erred in oveiTuling the demurrer to the complaint;
2. The court erred in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- McAroy v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Fultz v. WycoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Fillson v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by14 opinions
- Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Douglass v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hopkins v. BoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- West v. EleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. LottichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.