Legal Opinion

Pratt v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1938No. 43858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

This is a patent case in which plaintiff under Rule 38 (b) of procedure adopted by this Court December 14, 1937, has filed separate motions for a bill of particulars and for interrogatories. The rule reads as follows:

In any patent case, within 60 days from the filing of the general traverse (unless the time be otherwise extended by the Court) either party may file motions for interrogatories or bills of particular, or both, in order to prevent surprise and to suitably frame the issues to be met.

This rule was enacted by the Court under the authority given it by sec. 157 of the Judicial Code…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Olsen v. WhitneyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1901
  4. Rodman Chemical Co. v. E. F. Houghton Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Brown v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API