David A. Raymond and Lori Raymond v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY, Circuit Judge.
The Supreme Court has long asserted that “[i]n tax law, ... substance rather than form determines tax consequences.” Cottage Sav. Ass’n v. Comm’r, 499 U.S. 554, 570, 111 S.Ct. 1503, 113 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (citing Comm’r v. Court Holding Co., 324 U.S. 331, 334, 65 S.Ct. 707, 89 L.Ed. 981 (1945)). In this appeal, we are presented with an issue in which the line between substance and form has blurred. The question presented is whether a taxpayer who receives a recovery for lost wages, and who agreed to pay his attorney on a contingent-fee basis,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commissioner v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Altria Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Bank of New York Mellon Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Benenson v. Comm'rCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Altria v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.