Legal Opinion

Goddin v. Neal

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1884No. 11,271Published

From the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion

On Petition eor a Rehearing.

Ebanklin, C. —

Appellant, in his petition for a rehearing, insists that this court erred in the opinion herein, in holding that the evidence did not show that the fund herein sued for was a trust fund, and exempt from the operation of the bankrupt law. The only question presented is as to the sufficiency of the evidence. The only evidence introduced was a transcript of the proceedings and judgment in Kentucky, upon whick-this suit is brought, and a transcript of the proceedings in the bankruptcy court in Indiana.

*338The judgment says nothing about the nature of the fund…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Du Pont v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API