Legal Opinion

Du Pont v. Beck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 9116PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellants sued the appellees upon a promissory note, alleging that the plaintiffs had consigned goods to the defendants to sell for the plaintiffs, the proceeds of sales to be held by the defendants in trust for and to be paid over to the plaintiffs, less the commission due the defendants for selling; and that on the 23d day of April, 1878, the defendants had in their hands, belonging to the plaintiffs, $2,898, which they had unlawfully and fraudulently converted to their own use, and upon demand refused to pay plaintiffs; and, as an evidence of the indebtedness, executed to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Hennequin v. . ClewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Woodward v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  4. Woolsey v. CadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Green v. ChiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. State ex rel. EdgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Goddin v. NealIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Maxwell v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Goddin v. NealIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API