Legal Opinion

United States v. Forbes

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil 3:08cv933 (JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT— FREIMOUR

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

In this case, whose procedural background is described in the Court’s ruling on the United States’ summary judgment motion against codefendant Frank Gallagi [Doc. # 264], the United States moves for summary judgment against Beth Freimour, to recover the value of transfers it claims were constructively and intentionally fraudulent in violation of the Federal Debt Collection Procedure Act (“FDCPA”).

I. Factual Background

Defendant Beth Freimour was Walter Forbes’ assistant at Cendant and left Cendant in July 1998…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SchippersDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
  2. United States of America v. Sean Falzarano and Joanna FalzaranoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API