Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Barnard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 2008No. 347A07Published

1DissentBrady, Justice

Defendant’s thirty second delay at a traffic intersection after the light turned green did not violate any law and, standing alone, could not have raised a reasonable, articulable suspicion that defendant was engaged in criminal activity. Consequently, Officer Maltby’s stop of defendant’s vehicle for purportedly “impeding flow of traffic” was an unconstitutional seizure of defendant’s person in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. The trial court erred when it concluded otherwise.

By affirming the decision of a divided panel of the Court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API